William Foot & Emily Day Eglintine,
William Foot
The start of the story.
WILLIAM FOOT was born in 1830 in Pointington,
His parents were Charles Foot, a shepherd, and Mary Foot and he worked as an agricultural labourer for the first part of his working life. He was one of at least ten children (see main family listing elsewhere)
He was baptised on February 21st 1830 at the Parish Church. He joined the army, in his early twenties, and served for many years.
He married Emily Eglantine Blizard at St Botolph’s
Emily was born in 1846 in Northfleet,
Interestingly, William Blizzard’s father was a
Licensed Thames Waterman, baptised on
*** follow this link to
a site about Thames Watermen. http://hometown.aol.com/rjcindex/TRUEFLARE.html
Emma-Day’s Father was shown as a Surveyor and he was also probably born in the later part of the 18th century. The editor was unable to trace Emma-Day’s father back as the records of the I C S don’t go back that far..
At the time of the wedding, William was stationed at
His army service record was obtained from the Regimental
muster rolls held at the Public Record Office,
The life of a soldier – in fact any serviceman – in the 19th century was bitterly hard and often cruel. Private soldiers were seen as not much higher than slaves and treated abominably by today’s standards. Thus there were strong incentives for a brighter type of man to strive for promotion and a little better lifestyle.
![]()
At
the time of his death in 1871, William was a Chelsea Pensioner, having served in
the 1st Battalion of the 8th
Regiment of Foot, or The Kings Regiment,
which later still became the Liverpool Regiment.
He was a private at the time of the Indian Mutiny (his regimental number, 2992 puts his enlistment around the late 1840 s or early 1850 s)
He left the army with the rank of Drill Serjeant still with the 8th Foot – just a few short months before he died.
He received an Indian Mutiny Medal, 1857 - 59, (seen to left & right) with the 1st Battalion of the 8th Foot. He would have been in his late twenties at the time. The causes and full effects of the Indian Mutiny are well dealt with elsewhere and no judgements should be made from these contemporary accounts.
Here is a little of the story of the campaign in which he fought.
(Please note that in the following accounts, the old spellings are used throughout, e.g. Ghoorka instead of the modern Ghurkha. Towns & locations are as they were know in the mid-nineteenth century.
William’s Army Service
The Kings Regiment,
The 8th Regiment of foot has a proud and varied history It was
originally called Princess Anne’s Regiment in 1685 when James II increased his
Army. Princess Anne of
Problems with James’ autocratic ways eventually led
to his exile and when the Prince of Orange landed, the regiment was
strengthened and was sent to
This turned out to be a near disaster as disease was rife and medical facilities almost non-existent the Regiment dwindled to less than 500 men! Once recovered the Regiment took a major part in the Siege of Cork, landing from open boats in the face of the enemy. The whole assault was led by the Earl of Marlborough who crops up again in the regiment’s history.
By the beginning of the 18th century, Princess Anne had
acceded and so the Regiment became the Queen’s Regiment. It served continuously
on the Continent and played a major part in the battle of Oudenarde in 1708,
including covering, with the others, 50 miles in 48 hours! The 8th
held the place of honour on the right flank. The French defeat at this battle
was crippling. The Regiment took part in many smaller battles and the larger
ones such as Blenheim,
Ramillies and Malplaquet.
Commemorative Medals were struck on the order of Queen Anne to mark each
of
At home – under Lt Gen. Wolfe, they did well in the battles of Falkirk & Culloden. In the mid-18th century they became Eighth of Foot, the King’s Regiment.
A few years later, a 2nd battalion was raised
and was sent to the
Were to seize
Following a successful bombardment by the warships, the town went up in flames. A landing was made and the town was found to be in ruins and the garrison abandoned.
However, the French had retreated to an impregnable position in the mountains. For over a month the landed force was unable to proceed and was being harassed constantly.
Other actions were more successful and eventually
Maj. Gen Barrington arrived at
The mountains where -0 cut off from supplies - they
surrendered.. The 63rd stayed
to garrison
In 1808, both the 63rd and the Kings
took part in another assault on
The next memorable campaign was in
Notably, Captain Forster laid siege to and forced the
surrender of
The commander of the – now abandoned – Montréal Garrison decided to intervene in a flotilla of boats. Forster set an effective ambush using as his bases spits of land extending into the river and posted men on each and as the boats, working hard to move upstream, came into range, they were sitting ducks for the marksmen from their concealed positions. The single platoon of the Kings resisted the landing so well that the landing force retreated “Dispirited and exhausted…”
Later, when war broke out again in 1812, the King’s were there and again held the frontier posts around Lakes Erie & Ontario, For the whole of the 2 years, the British & Canadian troops were outnumbered but there were a few successful “tip & run” operations when men and colours were seized.
In the defence of York (now Toronto) the two Kings Companies lost half their strength, and at Fort George, outnumbered 5 to 1 five King’s companies lost 6 officers and almost 200 OR s
THE KING’S REGIMENT (8TH REGIMENT OF FOOT) IN
THE EARLY STAGES OF THE INDIAN MUTINY.
Here is a report, constructed using extracts from contemporary accounts and official dispatches. The images are used in order to enhance the reader’s interest in the account. It must have been an exciting but daunting time for all involved.
1857. On the 28th of March the half-yearly inspection
of the regiment was again made by Brigadier M. C. Johnstone. The numbers
present on this occasion and
total strength have not been recorded.
In the month of May, when the mutiny of the Sepoy Army in Bengal
broke out, the Thirty-sixth, and Sixty-first Native Infantry, the Sixth Native
Cavalry, one European and one native troop of Horse Artillery were quartered
with the regiment at Jullundur. Two marches to the south was the fort of
Phillour, commanding the bridge of boats which at that point connected the
Punjab with the North West provinces. It contained a magazine, siege train and
stores, protected by guards of the Third Native Infantry, which regiment was in
the adjacent cantonment.
Immediately after the Meerut outbreak, orders were despatched from
Simla by the Commander-in-Chief, directing the Officer commanding at Jullundur
to secure Phillour. But before the order reached the station.
Colonel H. W. Hartley, of the KING’S, who
commanded during Brigadier Johnstone’s temporary absence, had taken measures
for the purpose on his own responsibility. The Meerut outbreak took place on
the 10th, and the news reached him by electric telegraph on the 12th. The same
night he detached Brevet-Major R. S. Baynes with Lieutenant Longfield, Ensign
W. Webb, one hundred and sixty-two men of his own regiment and two guns, and on
the morning of 13th May, these troops obtained possession of the fort
without bloodshed.
This important success, which secured valuable material for the
siege of Delhi, was not obtained too soon, for, as became known afterwards, the
fort was to have been seized next day, on behalf of the mutineers, by the Third
Native Infantry. Major Baynes and his party remained at Phillour. As May
advanced, the state of the native troops in Jullundur, who had unfortunately
been left in possession of their arms, began to cause uneasiness.
The .KING’S regiment was therefore
kept ready in its lines, and a captain and subaltern
with one hundred of its men, mounted guard in those of the artillery, where the
women and children of the station were assembled for safety. On the night of
the 7th June the native troops, numbering over two thousand two hundred men,
broke into revolt. The strength of the KING’S
regiment on that day, as shown by the morning state was twenty-three officers
and seven hundred and thirty-five non-commissioned officers and privates (of
whom thirty-two were in hospital).
The outbreak at Julhmdur, like many others throughout India, was
immediately preceded by a great incendiary fire. On the alarm
being given, about
On the 14th June the regiment received orders to proceed to
reinforce the army under Sir Harry Barnard, then
engaged in the siege of

to the
Third Brigade. The heat of the weather and forced marching had tried the
regiment severely. The casualties on the march were Quartermaster Ross and
eight men, who died from sunstroke or fever. (alongside is shown the type of field station for wounded
& sick)
The strength of the regiment on arrival was twenty-one officers
and three hundred and forty-one non-commissioned officers and privates. These
numbers did not vary much throughout the siege, for the reinforcements
occasionally received from Umballa were counterbalanced by the sick and wounded
men who from time to time returned to that station.
Sir Harry Barnard's army consisted of about nine hundred reliable
cavalry, and three thousand nine hundred infantry, with twenty-eight field and
sixteen siege guns. His camp lay on the north of the ridge running south-west
from the Juana, which at a distance varying from a mile to half a mile
commanded the north-west front of the defences of Delhi. The piquets and
batteries occupied this ridge, but the weakness of the British as yet precluded
any serious attempt to lay siege to the place. At this period the rebel force
in Delhi it is supposed, may have consisted of about nine thousand Sepoys with
their corps; there were also many furlough men, and a large number of armed
customs guards, jail guards, and the like. Besides these
there must be reckoned a multitude of Mussulman insurgents. The total
number of armed men available for the defence of the city may be roughly
estimated at thirty thousand. The
artillery at the disposal of the rebels consisted of sixty field pieces, and
there were one hundred and fourteen guns on the walls. The defences were in good order, and
consisted of a rampart with berm and dry ditch, and with bastions at irregular
intervals. Those facing the British position extended to three-quarters of a
mile—equal to about an eighth of the “whole enceinte” —and were flanked by
three bastions, the “Water,” “
The brigade to which the regiment belonged
occupied the left of the position on the slope of the ridge near the
On the 9th the regiment commanded by Lieutenant-Colonel Greathed,
with other troops, was sent under Brigadier Chamberlain to dislodge a large
rebel force which had occupied some gardens beyond the extreme right of the
British position. These gardens were thickly wooded and enclosed, and they
contained some houses which had been converted into defensive posts. The KING’S was on the right of the line, but the nature
of the ground was such that no regular formation could be long preserved, and
the troops eventually fought in groups. After a severe contest, lasting several
hours, the enemy was forced to retire on Delhi through the suburb of Kissen
Gunj; but being reinforced from. the town they
rallied, again advanced, and surrounded a serai which had been occupied by the
regiment, and by detached parties of the Sixty-first, and of several of the
Private John Brown, greatly distinguished himself by his gallantry
in this charge, and was in consequence promoted to the rank of corporal. During this day's fighting the loss
sustained by the regiment was eleven men killed, Captain Daniell, Ensign
Mounsteven, and twenty-one men wounded. Ensign Mounsteven died of his wound on
the following day, and Captain Daniell was completely disabled for the rest of
the campaign. Lieutenant and Adjutant Walker had his horse shot. The strength shown in the morning state was
three hundred and twenty-three non-commissioned officers and privates, of whom
twenty-seven were in the hospital. Brigadier A, Wilson of the Bengal Artillery
was now appointed to command the army, and Colonel
Baird Smith became chief engineer. Under the direction of these officers the
batteries were improved and better armed, but the supply of men and material at
their disposal was not yet sufficient for a vigorous prosecution of the siege.
On the 14th July the enemy attacked the right of the position with numerous
forces. On that day one hundred and thirty men of the
regiment under Captains A. C. Robertson. and.
J. M. Bannatyne were on piquet at the fortified post of the Subzee Mundee
serai, which covered the extreme right of the ridge. The Sammy House, another
fortified post in the immediate vicinity, being seriously threatened by the
enemy, forty men of the piquet under Lieutenant Grierson were detached to its
aid. Several attacks subsequently made on it by strong columns of rebel
infantry, supported by field artillery and a heavy fire from the guns on the ramparts
of the city, were repulsed. The Subzee Mundee piquet also was itself attacked
by other large bodies of rebels, who, taking advantage of ruined buildings and
enclosures, established themselves close to the walls on three sides of the
post, and for several hours kept up an incessant but nearly harmless fire.
Except a few marksmen posted at loopholes, the men of the piquet
were kept under cover ready to repel the enemy had they come to close quarters.
No assault was attempted, and the only casualty of the piquet was one man
wounded. About 3 P.M., Brigadier Showers brought out a brigade and drove the
enemy into the town. His loss was fifteen officers and one hundred and
sixty-five men killed or wounded. Among the officers severely wounded was
Lieutenant-Colonel Neville Chamberlain, Adjutant-General of the Army. The main
body of the regiment under Colonel Greathed was kept in reserve at the
flagstaff tower on the ridge and was not engaged.
On the 17th July the Third Brigade changed camp to the parade
ground of the old cantonment. Cholera
still continued, and the regiment had about eighty men on the sick list, but
the change of camp had a beneficial effect. On the 18th July the regiment
commanded by Captain A. C. Robertson, together with the Sixtieth Rifles, a
Goorkha Battalion, and the Fourth Sikh Infantry, was employed under Brigadier
Jones of the Sixtieth in repelling a sortie on the British right. The enemy having occupied a
ruined village in rear of the Subzee Mundee piquet. Captain W. Bayly
with the light company of the regiment was sent round it, whilst Lieutenant
Souter with the Grenadiers led the attack in front. The enemy was thus driven
out and fell back on Delhi. The force advanced as far as the enclosures below
Ghosipore and then withdrew, being covered in its retreat by the
companies of Captains G. E. Baynes and J. M. Bannatyne, which alternately
relieved each other in extended order. The regiment was again, engaged on the
23rd under the command of Major Brooke as part. of a
force which under Lieutenant-Colonel Greathed, repulsed a sortie on the British
left. The enemy having taken possession of some houses in front of the Cashmere
gate the regiment with other troops advanced in line without firing, and
carried them by assault. The rebels retired into the town and a fire of grape
from the walls immediately opened, under which the troops fell back on the
ridge. In this action Lieutenant Pogson was slightly wounded. The losses
sustained by the regiment in action between 10th. and
31st July were twelve men killed, one officer and thirty-three men wounded. The
deaths from disease in July were fifty. Throughout August the increasing
strength of the British was gradually making the prospects of the siege more
hopeful The duties were now very severe, and the
regiment was almost constantly on outpost. But when off duty the men had rest,
for the defence of the position was generally left to the piquets which were
strengthened, and so strongly posted that although frequently attacked they
were rarely required. Lieutenant Sandilands was severely wounded by the
splinter of a shell whilst on piquet on 10th August. Before
daybreak on 12th August a detachment of the brigade consisting of one hundred
men. of the KING’S
with one hundred of the Sixty-first, commanded by Captain A. C. Robertson, was
sent with other troops under Brigadier Showers to attack a large body of rebels
which had taken up a position at
On the 4th September, twenty-five siege guns and the last of the
available reinforcements from the Punjab joined the army; with these came the
detachments of the KING’S from Jullundur and
Phillour, in all about two hundred men, with Lieutenants Beere and Stebbing.
The strength of the Army, reckoning recruits and new levies, was about nine
thousand eight hundred and sixty-six men; of these about four thousand were British. There was also at the
disposal of General Wilson the
The three breaches were within a distance of four hundred yards in
the most northern front of the fortification. One was in the left face of the
Water Bastion, another in the right face of the Cashmere Bastion, and the third
in the curtain connecting these bastions. Looking from the breaching batteries
towards the town, the Water Bastion breach was on the left, the Cashmere
Bastion breach on the right, and the curtain breach intermediate between the
two. The breach in the curtain was, as the event proved, the most practicable
of the three, but its practicability had not been ascertained, and its
approaches were flanked by the fire of the bastions. The two bastion breaches were therefore
selected for attack, and a simultaneous effort was to be made to force a way
through the Cashmere Gate, which was close to the left flank of the Cashmere
Bastion and the curtain between it and the Moree Bastion. At 11 P.M. The same
night orders for the assault were issued. The army paraded at
No. 1. (Storming party carrying ladders). Captain G. E Baynes, Lieutenants Pogson and Metge, and seventy five
R. and F. (Rank & File)
No. 2. Brevet-Major B. S. Baynes, Lieutenants J. V.
Webb and McGrigor, and sixty-eight R. and F.
No. 3. Captain J. M. Bannatyne, Lieutenants Beere and
Stebbing, and sixty-eight R. and F.
No. 4. Lieutenant E. N. Sandilands, Lieutenant Bayly, Ensign W. Webb. and sixty-nine R. and F. The field and staff officers
present were Major Brooke,
Lieutenant and Adjutant Walker, Surgeon Annesley, Assistant
Surgeons Yates and Biddle.
When formed the columns proceeded to
their posts to await the signal for the assault, which was to be the explosion
at the Cashmere Gate. The post of the second column was in the vicinity of the
left flank breaching battery, but as the storming party had to proceed first to
the gorge near the Metcalfe Piquet to receive the ladders from the Engineers,
the rest of the column waited for it in the Koodsia Bagh, immediately behind
the battery. Here Colonel Greathed, who
had been on duty all night in charge of the left attack, joined and took
command of the regiment.
A heavy artillery fire from the British batteries was going on,
and had to some extent silenced the guns on the bastions. The rebels, however,
still kept up a fire of musketry from. the ramparts,
and had sent guns across the
Storming party of the KING’S With ladders.
Support of seventy-five men, Second
Fusiliers. Remainder of the KING’S
in three companies. Remainder of Second Fusiliers. Fourth Sikh Infantry.
The storming party was guided by Lieutenants Greathed and Hovenden
of the Bengal Engineers, and made straight, as directed, for the breach in the
Water Bastion. But the supporting party of the Second Fusiliers, which was not
encumbered with ladders, pressing eagerly forward on the right of the storming
party, soon came in full view of the easy breach in the curtain. The temptation
it presented was too strong to be resisted, or perhaps in the confusion and smoke it was
mistaken for the breach in. the bastion. In any case, the seventy-five men of
the Second Fusiliers, closely followed by the rest of the column, leaving the
stormers of the KING’S to pursue their course
alone, rushed to the counterscarp of the curtain, slid into its ditch, swarmed
up its breach and won the rampart.
The three companies of the KING’S
thus led to the wrong breach by the support which they had been ordered to
follow, had Brevet-Major K. S. Baynes, Lieutenants Beere and
Meanwhile the storming party of the KING’S
Advanced alone to the breach in the Water Bastion.
What occurred is thus described, in a letter, written by Captain G. E. Baynes,
who commanded the party, dated 16th September (two days after the assault):
“Off we went at a trot up the glacis (the distance was
about one hundred and fifty yards). It was now broad daylight. I looked at the wall and saw it crammed with
Sepoys. The wall in perfect order except just at the breach
which was twelve feet wide. I hope I may never see again a carnage like
that which followed. A nine-pounder played upon us with grape from the
bastion, and a fearful fire of musketry from the walls—steady, rapid file
firing— unchecked lay the fire of a
covering party, so not a shot was
returned. You may easily imagine the
consequence to a party advancing steadily and slowly in face of such a
fire. The men were knocked over by sixes
and sevens. Young Greathed was one of
the first wounded. Metge also fell and
ladder after ladder went down. When I got within thirty yards of the edge of
the ditch, I looked round, and out of eighteen ladders I saw only three left. I
ran on to the edge to see what. sort of place was
before us, and called out to the ladder bearers to hurry on. I don't know what
occurred after this as I fell to the ground and remained insensible for a few minutes. When I
recovered I saw no one standing near me, but two grenadiers were lying down a short distance
off'. I was too much exhausted to move, besides to lie still was the best
thing to do. The fire from
the walls continued as heavy as ever. I knew that three- quarters
of the storming party were knocked over, and I looked in vain for the strong
supports that were to follow us. We were evidently left to shift for ourselves.
Suddenly the fire from the walls ceased. I got up and with the few men left
went into the ditch, and into the bastion. In it we found some artillerymen who had got in through the
(Note;
This was an almost incredible and valiant attack with the most courageous
behaviour of the British troops.)
After mustering his party Captain Baynes had to be carried to the
rear himself, being unable to stand from excessive exhaustion. Colour-Sergeant
Walker, who had greatly distinguished himself, now took command of the twenty-five men
left. He was unable to find his own regiment, which had pushed on with the
second column immediately after entry.
A party of the Fifty-second drew near a little later, but the
Serjeant and his men were detained in the bastion by Major Brind of the
Artillery, and employed, for some days in working the guns which were
immediately directed against the outwork of Selim Ghur — still held by the
rebels. The Colour-Serjeant subsequently received the medal for distinguished
conduct in the field. The mistake, or whatever it was, that made the support
separate from the storming party and lead the rest of the column to the curtain
breach, produced fortunate results. Nothing could have more effectually
paralysed the defence than this movement, which forced the place at a vital
point, turned the defenders' positions in the adjoining bastions, and fell on
their line of retreat. It is impossible to say with precision what influence it
had in securing the success of the first and third columns. But when it is
remembered that one of them had to storm a large bastion held by superior
numbers, and that the other had to force its way at a re-entering angle of the
works through a gateway which was still susceptible of defence - although the
gate itself had been destroyed - the effect may safely be assumed to have been
considerable. To the storming party of
the KING’S struggle to make its way alone into
the Water Bastion, it probably brought more effectual aid than direct support
would have given it. On the other hand the intrepid advance of the storming
party, by distracting the attention of the defenders, and
drawing a large share of fire from the walls, no doubt diminished the
losses sustained by the main body, and contributed to the success of its attack.
Thus the lives of the brave, men. who
fell in the attempt to escalade the Water Bastion were not uselessly
sacrificed.

Once the mutiny ended, reprisals were swift and brutal. Those judged to be leaders were summarily
charged tried and many were hung but many also were “Shot from guns” OR “ fired from
cannons” That was the strength of feeling at the time of course.
(See picture on the left)
The
aftermath.
The mutiny continued until 1859 and shortly after that the Battalion returned to Britain.
In 1870, now aged 40, William was at the Battalion HQ in
In those days, the term
The
The pensioners actually resident at Chelsea were termed "In-pensioners" whilst the majority became "Out-pensioners" and received their pension in cash terms rather than in hospital care.
Chelsea pensions were paid by local agents before the British Army established regional pension administration offices at the end of the 19th century.
This next paragraph could be considered to be speculative but is almost certain to be correct.
The name on the birth certificate of Emma Ellen (the Editor’s Grandmother) is given as Foot, also when she married in 1894, though in the 1881 census, she is shown as Emma Ellen Brown, being the stepdaughter of James Brown to whom her mother, Emily was married following the death of William. This would have been an error on the part of the Enumerator, such errors were common during the 19th century as genealogists will know well.
James was a Blacksmith and no doubt Emily married him out of necessity as I believe the Chelsea Pension of 1/ 1 ½ d (One shilling and one and one half pence in pre-decimal British Currency.) would have died with him leaving Emily and Emma almost destitute.
The cause of William’s death is given as “Pyæmia for 31 days…” - literally pus in the blood - a common description applied to what we now call Septicæmia.
At the time of his army discharge he was being paid 2s and 3 d (two shillings and three pence) per day as a Serjeant and he was allocated to Canteen Duties.
Further study will no doubt reveal more of the sort of service he underwent during the bulk of his army career. One thing is certain, it was a very hard life and he would have needed to be a very tough individual to survive long enough in the ranks to rise to, first Corporal and then Serjeant, especially as he was, in the latter part of his service, a Drill Serjeant - a man much to be feared by recruits and old timers alike.
Below is the contemporary account of Will’s funeral
from the Mansfield Reporter on
THE FUNERAL OF THE LATE SERGEANT FOOT.
On Wednesday
afternoon the remains of the late Sergeant Foot, drill instructor to the 4th
Notts. Rifle Volunteers, were interred in the Cemetery with military
honours. The deceased, who during his connection with the corps had gained the
esteem of every one connected therewith, died suddenly on Monday morning about
The deceased, who was 41 years of age, formerly belonged to the 8th Regiment of Foot, and served with that regiment through the Indian Mutiny, for which he obtained a medal. A large number of people assembled in the Cemetery to witness the funeral, as we believe that the deceased had not only won the esteem of the Volunteers but also of every one with whom he came in contact.
Geoff Hunt, Great Great
Grandson of William and Emily Foot.